In moments of profound structural change, simple answers are often the most dangerous ones. First-Order Thinking might soothe us into complacency, offer temporary certainty, and, most concerning of all, give the illusion that complexity has been neatly resolved.
Recently, I had a conversation with a senior executive about the economic structural shifts unfolding globally—from re-shoring manufacturing to geopolitical realignment and the transformation of supply chains. His initial response, delivered with confidence and optimism, startled me:
“Well, if supply chains are disrupted, tariffs increase, and imports become expensive, that’ll be good for domestic manufacturing. We’ll go back to a 1960s-style manufacturing boom—that doesn’t sound so bad. In fact, that’s great news.”
This perspective isn’t unique to him; it’s a common first-order conclusion—a surface-level analysis that considers only the immediate consequences of a global shift without tracing its cascading effects through second, third, fourth, or fifth-order consequences.
But history teaches us one undeniable truth: first-order thinking rarely delivers sustainable results in complex systems.
First-Order Thinking vs. Fifth-Order Reality
At first glance, it does seem logical: if global supply chains weaken, domestic manufacturing will fill the void. Jobs will be created, factories will hum, and a new era of self-sufficiency will emerge.
But the reality is far more complex. The structural changes unfolding today will not result in a repeat of the 1960s manufacturing boom. Here’s why:
- The Construction Industry is Already Overstretched and Fragile:
- Projects initiated in 2021-2022 are being completed 20% over budget.
- New projects are being priced at 50% higher costs compared to just two years ago, rendering many commercially unviable.
- The federal government’s push for social housing construction is adding even more pressure to a system already stretched to its limits.
- The Industrial Infrastructure Mismatch:
- The factories needed for modern manufacturing aren’t the ones built decades ago. They require larger footprints, specialized facilities, advanced energy systems, and digital integration.
- Much of Australia’s existing industrial land is poorly located, undersized, and obsolete.
- Developing new industrial zones on greenfield sites would require massive investment in roads, utilities, and logistics hubs—a process that will take a decade, not four years.
- Skills Shortages Are at a Crisis Point:
- The construction workforce is already struggling to meet current demand.
- Adding new industrial construction projects into the mix without addressing this shortfall will only drive up costs further and create delays.
- Skilled labor in advanced manufacturing—robotics engineers, automation specialists, digital maintenance experts—is exceptionally scarce.
- The Manufacturing Workforce of the Future Won’t Look Like the Past:
- Modern factories are not assembly lines filled with workers; they are automated hubs overseen by a handful of highly skilled technicians.
- Our existing Manufacturing workforce are unskilled and poor fit for the new Automated Manufactirng roles.
- A single robotics technician might oversee production once handled by 100 assembly-line workers.
- A manufacturing boom, therefore, won’t create broad-based employment—it will create specialized employment gaps.
- The Housing Crisis is an Anchor on Growth:
- Every additional construction worker, every incoming immigrant required to fill labor shortages, will need housing.
- Australia’s housing crisis is already dire, and further demand will exacerbate both housing affordability and social inequality.
The simplistic vision of a 1960s-style boom is a mirage. The structural shifts happening today require a deep, multi-layered strategy, not optimism based on first-order assumptions.
The Structural Shifts Are Moving Faster Than We Think
The timeline for these global changes isn’t being set by policymakers or executives—it’s being set by geopolitical events, supply chain fractures, and technological advancements.
- Supply chains are being rewritten in real-time.
- Tariffs and trade barriers are being introduced with little warning.
- Capital is flowing into resilient, future-proof infrastructure at breakneck speed.
Australia, and regions like the Central Coast, face a critical challenge:
- The world will not wait for us to sort through regulatory red tape, align policy frameworks, or build consensus.
- If we move slowly, we’ll still arrive at the future—but we’ll arrive unprepared, over budget, and left behind by faster-moving competitors.
There’s a simple but painful truth: if we don’t act decisively now, the cost of catching up later will be astronomical—and many won’t survive the effort.
Decisive Leadership: The 6A’s Decision-Making Framework
In periods of economic transition, leadership becomes a decisive advantage. The best leaders don’t rely on optimism—they rely on structured, disciplined decision-making frameworks to navigate uncertainty.
I often refer to the 6A’s of Decision Making:
- Awareness: Understand the global forces shaping our reality.
- Analysis: Look beyond first-order outcomes—trace the effects through second, third, fourth, and fifth-order consequences.
- Alignment: Align capital, talent, and policy decisions with long-term megatrends.
- Action: Move with speed and conviction—hesitation carries immense costs.
- Agility: Remain flexible as variables shift and conditions evolve.
- Accountability: Ensure decisions are monitored, measured, and recalibrated when necessary.
For policymakers, executives, and investors alike, this framework isn’t optional—it’s imperative for survival.
The Case for Gentrifying Industrial Land
One of the most actionable strategies for Australia’s future readiness lies in gentrifying outdated industrial land.
- Demolish and rebuild obsolete zones.
- Amalgamate smaller blocks into larger, purpose-built precincts.
- Align infrastructure upgrades with the needs of modern manufacturing hubs.
This approach is faster, more cost-effective, and less disruptive than attempting to create entirely new greenfield industrial zones.
But it must start now.
A Final Word: Optimism, Realism, and Urgency
I share the optimism that Australia can thrive in this era of transition. But optimism alone isn’t a strategy—it must be paired with:
- Clear-eyed analysis of risks and opportunities.
- Decisive, early action on scalable initiatives.
- Leadership that refuses to settle for first-order thinking.
As Ray Dalio warns us, the difference between regions that rise and fall during moments of transition is leadership and timing.
The next decade will define whether Australia—and regions like the Central Coast—capitalize on this opportunity or fall victim to delayed action and complacency.
The world is changing. The time to act is now. And for those who see clearly, act decisively, and think deeply—the rewards will be immense.
Let’s not mistake first-order assumptions for strategy. Let’s act with clarity, depth, and urgency.
Time is of the essence. Leadership must rise to meet the moment. Let’s build the future—together.
Connect
Connect and discuss how these principles can transform your business.
And access the full advice here
Do you want to 2x, 5x or 10x your Profits?
Download the Playbook and connect to tailor or Join our Master Class Club: Join for free
Want More:
- Connect for more.
- Connect on LinkedIn
- Checkout more on this Pricing Series
- Checkout more Book Review in this series
- Connect for more free material and coaching
